LexisNexis Canada is outlining how agentic AI could help lawyers manage complex legal research, with software carrying an assignment through multiple steps while lawyers retain responsibility for the analysis. In a blog post last week, the company describes a workflow built around a defined research objective. An AI system can pursue related questions, revisit authorities […]
LexisNexis
Atlantic Judges Put Human Judgment at the Centre of Courtroom AI
AI-assisted submissions are becoming a regular presence in Atlantic Canadian courtrooms, raising questions about accuracy, professional competence and the growing volume of material judges must review. A new LexisNexis Canada blog post explores those challenges through insights from Justice Peter Browne of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador and Justice Maya Hamou of New […]
LexisNexis Explores Agentic AI’s Role in Legal Research
Agentic AI could reduce the effort lawyers spend coordinating legal research, according to a new LexisNexis Canada post examining the technology’s implications for Canadian practice. LexisNexis describes a shift from answering individual prompts to carrying out connected tasks within a broader assignment. A research objective could encompass identifying the governing legal test, finding relevant decisions, […]
Harvey and LexisNexis Launch AI Workflow for Motions to Dismiss
Harvey has introduced a litigation drafting workflow co-developed with LexisNexis that helps lawyers prepare motions to dismiss, combining AI agents with legal research and lawyer review. The launch marks the first jointly developed workflow under the companies’ strategic alliance, announced in June 2025. It draws on U.S. case law, statutes and Shepard’s Citations Service. Lawyers […]
LexisNexis Urges Canadian Lawyers to Put Accountability at the Centre of AI Adoption
LexisNexis Canada is urging lawyers to make verification, oversight and clear internal policies central to their use of artificial intelligence. In a recent blog post, the company argues that AI’s ability to produce polished legal text does not change who is accountable for the finished work. Lawyers still need to assess the underlying reasoning, protect […]









